Not all sensors are created equal, and the overall image quality is heavily affected by the sensor technology as well. So, if you compare the image quality of a full-frame camera from 10 years ago to a modern APS-C under similar low light conditions, you probably won’t find any differences, and the APS-C image might be a little bit better too.
This extends to the APS-C lenses that people often use with them. For those with smaller hands or who want a lighter option (especially if on the go), this may be preferred. Sony's Full Frame mirrorless cameras are a bit larger and heavier (although still quite lighter and more compact compared to DSLR options).
Check out the full-frame list as well because some of those lenses are of great value and work very well for APS-C. The Rokinon APS-C lenses are actually very good. They are all manual focus right now, but if you want really high-quality glass at a pretty affordable price and you like manual focus, these are going to give you the best results.
frame is about 43.3mm. Dividing 43.3 by 26.6 gives a lens conversion factor of 1.6x for APS-C; dividing 43.3 by 34.7 gives a lens conversion factor of 1.3x for APS-H. Lenses of 20mm, 50mm and 300mm will become, functionally, 32mm, 80mm and 480mm respectively for APS-C. The original lenses will now have the field-of-view, or
The 2009 Phase One P40 with a larger than full frame sensor scored 1307 ISO. The 5300 is arguably the best low light performing APSC camera ever sold - but it's superiority relative to your NEX-5R is minimal. The 5R has a DXO low-light ISO rating of 910 ISO. In stops this is log_base_2 (1338/910) = 0.56 stops.
7fvszFa. 2htmin25yk.pages.dev/5332htmin25yk.pages.dev/3822htmin25yk.pages.dev/4102htmin25yk.pages.dev/2462htmin25yk.pages.dev/1502htmin25yk.pages.dev/3402htmin25yk.pages.dev/5552htmin25yk.pages.dev/423
full frame vs aps c lens conversion
